Wednesday, March 18, 2020

or Undermine Reasoning As A Way Of Knowing.

e ·mo ·tion ( -m sh n) n. 1. A mental state that arises spontaneously rather than through conscious effort and is often accompanied by physiological changes; a feeling: the emotions of joy, sorrow, reverence, hate, and love. 2. A state of mental agitation or disturbance: spoke unsteadily in a voice that betrayed his emotion. 3. The part of the consciousness that involves feeling; sensibility: â€Å"The very essence of literature is the war between emotion and intellect† (Isaac Bashevis Singer) rea ·son (r z n) n. 1. The basis or motive for an action, decision, or conviction. 2. A declaration made to explain or justify action, decision, or conviction: inquired about her reason for leaving. 3. An underlying fact or cause that provides logical sense for a premise or occurrence: There is reason to believe that the accused did not commit this crime. 4. The capacity for logical, rational, and analytic thought; intelligence. 5. Good judgment; sound sense. 6. A normal mental state; sanity: He has lost his reason. 7. Logic. A premise, usually the minor premise, of an argument.1 rea ·son ·ing (r z -n ng) n. 1. Use of reason, especially to form conclusions, inferences, or judgments. 2. Evidence or arguments used in thinking or argumentation.1 From the definitions provided, we can see that in this dictionary reason is defined as being synonymous with logic, and emotion with spontaneity. Logic is normally connected with conscious thought and premeditation, and emotion with instinct and reflex. You cannot plan what you feel, but you can plan what you will learn. Take, for example, the idea of scientific objectivity. Scientists carrying out experiments try to put their emotions and predispositions to one side, so as to not negate the objectivity of the experiment. Ideally, an experiment should be carried out in the pursuit of pure fact, and emotions would turn that pure fact into personal interpr... or Undermine Reasoning As A Way Of Knowing. Free Essays on Evaluate The Ways In Which Emotion Might Enhance And/or Undermine Reasoning As A Way Of Knowing. e ·mo ·tion ( -m sh n) n. 1. A mental state that arises spontaneously rather than through conscious effort and is often accompanied by physiological changes; a feeling: the emotions of joy, sorrow, reverence, hate, and love. 2. A state of mental agitation or disturbance: spoke unsteadily in a voice that betrayed his emotion. 3. The part of the consciousness that involves feeling; sensibility: â€Å"The very essence of literature is the war between emotion and intellect† (Isaac Bashevis Singer) rea ·son (r z n) n. 1. The basis or motive for an action, decision, or conviction. 2. A declaration made to explain or justify action, decision, or conviction: inquired about her reason for leaving. 3. An underlying fact or cause that provides logical sense for a premise or occurrence: There is reason to believe that the accused did not commit this crime. 4. The capacity for logical, rational, and analytic thought; intelligence. 5. Good judgment; sound sense. 6. A normal mental state; sanity: He has lost his reason. 7. Logic. A premise, usually the minor premise, of an argument.1 rea ·son ·ing (r z -n ng) n. 1. Use of reason, especially to form conclusions, inferences, or judgments. 2. Evidence or arguments used in thinking or argumentation.1 From the definitions provided, we can see that in this dictionary reason is defined as being synonymous with logic, and emotion with spontaneity. Logic is normally connected with conscious thought and premeditation, and emotion with instinct and reflex. You cannot plan what you feel, but you can plan what you will learn. Take, for example, the idea of scientific objectivity. Scientists carrying out experiments try to put their emotions and predispositions to one side, so as to not negate the objectivity of the experiment. Ideally, an experiment should be carried out in the pursuit of pure fact, and emotions would turn that pure fact into personal interpr...

Sunday, March 1, 2020

The Difference Between Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Clauses

The Difference Between Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Clauses The Difference Between Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Clauses The Difference Between Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Clauses By Mark Nichol An essential, or restrictive, clause is a part of a sentence that provides integral context for the reader. A nonessential, or nonrestrictive, clause is parenthetical, presenting additional information that is not necessary for reader comprehension. Writers are, with increasing frequency, neglecting to appreciate the distinction, thereby undermining the effectiveness of the language they use. The following sentences illustrate how this carelessness (or ignorance) adversely affects meaning. Discussion and revision of each sentence responds to the fact that each of the following sentences erroneously treats optional material as required content. 1. Phyllis Schlafly, the conservative political activist who devoted much of her energy in the 1970s to stopping the passage of the Equal Rights Amendment that would have banned discrimination on the basis of sex in the United States, has died. The phrase â€Å"The Equal Rights Amendment that would have banned discrimination . . .† implies that more than one such amendment was proposed and that this one in particular, and no others, was intended to ban the specified discrimination. However, â€Å"would have banned . . . United States† is helpful but nonessential information about the one and only amendment, and that phrase should be included parenthetically: â€Å"Phyllis Schlafly, the conservative political activist who devoted much of her energy in the 1970s to stopping the passage of the Equal Rights Amendment, which would have banned discrimination on the basis of sex in the United States, has died.† 2. Smith was referring to the Columbian mammoth which roamed the continent of North America before migrating to the Channel Islands. The sentence seems to imply that more than one species of Columbian mammoth existed, and that the one in question was native to North America but ended up on adjacent islands (with which substituting for the preferred pronoun that). However, the phrase â€Å"which roamed the continent of North America before migrating to the Channel Islands† is additional information attached to the main clause, â€Å"Smith was referring to the Columbian mammoth,† so it should be set off with a comma: â€Å"Smith was referring to the Columbian mammoth, which roamed the continent of North America before migrating to the Channel Islands.† 3. The two dwarf planets are in the asteroid belt that’s littered with rocky debris from the formation of the sun and planets some 4.5 billion years ago. The implication here is that more than one asteroid belt exists, and the one under discussion is littered with the described rocky debris; one or more others, presumably, has no such detritus. But the part of the sentence that follows â€Å"asteroid belt† is nonessential information that should be appended to the main clause parenthetically, with a comma separating the two sentence segments: â€Å"The two dwarf planets are in the asteroid belt, which is littered with rocky debris from the formation of the sun and planets some 4.5 billion years ago.† Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Grammar category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:50 Incorrect Pronunciations That You Should AvoidCapitalization Rules for the Names of Games90 Verbs Starting with â€Å"Ex-†